Blog

06 feb More on the Pew Cash Advance Research

To find 3, Pew takes at face value the claim by 81% of borrowers that, that they would delay paying bills, rely on family and friends or sell possessions if they were faced with a cash shortfall and had no access to payday loans, they would cut back on expenses, and the further claim.

There are several issues with this "finding," including the annotated following:

• While borrowers might well just simply just just take (or attempt to take) all of this enumerated actions when up against a financing dilemma of this sort, Pew never ever asks whether any or many of these actions will be effective. Does Pew actually believe, as reported, that 44% of borrowers could (effectively) get that loan from the bank or credit union, that 37% could use a credit simply card and/or that 17% could borrow from a boss? Consequently they are relatives and buddies actually able and ready to assist the cash advance debtor?
• Pew left from the listing of prospective actions two for the apparent actions a customer usually takes if payday advances are not for sale in storefronts within the customer's state: (1) seek that loan at a storefront in a state that is neighboring or (2) look for that loan on the web. Why had been these choices perhaps maybe maybe perhaps not presented to surveyed customers?
• Pew additionally did not ask why a customer with all the other choices Pew listed (and obviously views as more advanced than a quick payday loan) obtained an online payday loan into the place that is first. If Pew had expected this concern, it may can see that there have been good financial good reasons for the decision of a pay day loan and an description apart from customer lack of knowledge or lender deception.
• Pew assumes that just delaying the re re re re payment of bills is an excellent replacement for a pay day loan.